BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
X-WR-CALNAME;VALUE=TEXT:Colloquium Lecture: Shamik Dasgupta (UC Berkeley), "Objectivity as a Normative Notion (Twice Over)"
PRODID:-//Harvard events data//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event_1680901_0
SUMMARY:Colloquium Lecture: Shamik Dasgupta (UC Berkeley), "Objectivity as a Normative Notion (Twice Over)"
DESCRIPTION:<p>	<drupal-media data-entity-type="media" data-entity-uuid="6a87781f-a0a6-4664-8792-0da58869901f" alt="Dasgupta Lecture" data-view-mode="hwp_medium"></drupal-media></p><p>	Abstract: I will argue that objectivity is a normative notion. By this I don’t mean that objectivity has normative qualities such as being valuable or worth striving for. That may be true, but it’s not the claim defended here. Rather, the claim is that normativity is part of <em>what objectivity is</em>; that when we analyze objectivity we’ll find normativity built into it. Moreover, we’ll find <em>primitive</em> normativity—normative properties that are not identical or reducible to natural properties of the cosmos (or even super-natural properties of the divine, if there are such things). I have argued elsewhere that there is no such thing as primitive normativity, so for me the upshot is that there is no such thing as objectivity either. But your mileage may vary: if you’re wedded to objectivity, the upshot is that you’re wedded to primitive normativity too. </p><p>	 </p><p>	 </p>
LOCATION:
STATUS:CONFIRMED
DTSTART:20231117T200000Z
DTEND:20231117T220000Z
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR